Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurbovsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range817 km508 mi
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 194hp145kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,245kg4,949lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 817km508mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | - | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 817 km 508 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW | 6.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 194 hp 145 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 817 km 508 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 161 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























