Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range817 km508 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.1s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 761km473mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,446mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 104mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 5,800 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.1 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 7.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 761 km 473 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 817 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 761 km 473 mi | 817 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 220
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























