BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,589mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,641mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo has 10 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 6.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 889 km 552 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 817 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 817 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























