AUDI A6 Sedan (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions120 g/km
- Best estimated range1,370 km851 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,370km851mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,939mm194in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,886mm74in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,924mm115in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 3,750-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 6.6 s |
Although AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 1,370 km 851 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 817 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,370 km 851 mi | 817 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 40 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 553 km (343 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Is 276 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























