Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurbovsTesla Model 3 55 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.0 Turbo

200 hp1995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022
VS

Tesla Model 3

55 kWh

204 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Tesla Model 3 55 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboTeslaModel 355 kWh
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
2,005kg4,420lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
49.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
23.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
817km508mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
-
Length
4,643mm183in
4,694mm185in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,849mm73in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,875mm113in
Front track
1,571mm62in
-
Rear track
1,641mm65in
-
Trunk volume
480L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
-
CO2 emissions
164g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboTeslaModel 355 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
23.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
TeslaModel 355 kWh
204 hp
152 kW

Tesla Model 3 55 kWh has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Tesla Model 3 55 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
TeslaModel 355 kWh
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph
TeslaModel 355 kWh
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo6.6 s
TeslaModel 355 kWh5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 55 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
TeslaModel 355 kWh
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
TeslaModel 355 kWh
204 hp
152 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
TeslaModel 355 kWh
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboTeslaModel 355 kWh
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
6.6 s
5.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
817 km
508 mi
-
CO2 score
164 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 256 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Tesla Model 3 55 kWh

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Tesla Model 3 55 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Turbo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
55 kWh
60 kWh
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh
2.0 Turbo
A 220
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
55 kWh
Standard Plus 54 kWh
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsTeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Standard Plus 54 kWh
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
55 kWh
C 220d
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
55 kWh
E 200
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
2.0 Turbo
40 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201640 TFSI
55 kWh
2.2 MultiJet
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
2.0 Turbo
C 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
55 kWh
320d
VS
TeslaModel 355 kWhvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
2.0 Turbo
E 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo vs Tesla Model 3 55 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster