Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-present
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.0 Turbo

200 hp1995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    817 km
    508 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,429kg3,150lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
2,005kg4,420lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
65.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
24.3s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km450mi
Calculated
817km508mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,751mm187in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,437mm57in
1,438mm57in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,571mm62in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,641mm65in
Trunk volume
455L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
58L
CO2 emissions-
164g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.3 s
23.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
1,429 kg
3,150 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
241 km/h
150 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2007.1 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo6.6 s

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
725 km
450 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
817 km
508 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Range score
725 km
450 mi
817 km
508 mi
CO2 score
-
164 g/km
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 201 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 Turbo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 Turbo
A 220
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0 Turbo
40 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201640 TFSI
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
2.0 Turbo
E 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
C 200
AMG C 36
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster