Abarth Pulse
Car comparison
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270vsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful175 hp130 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score47/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 175hp130kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 248Nm183lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 646km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,115mm162in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | - |
| Height | 1,575mm62in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,532mm100in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,484mm58in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 188mm7in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 5,750 rpm | 1,850 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 175 hp 130 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW |
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 has 5 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 8.0 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 7.4 s |
Although Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 175 hp 130 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 646 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 22 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 86 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























