Car comparison

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270vsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Abarth Pulse

1.3 T270

175 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAbarthPulse1.3 T270MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
175hp130kW
186hp139kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
37.4s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,332cc81cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,115mm162in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,777mm70in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,575mm62in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,532mm100in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,484mm58in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,510mm59in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
188mm7in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
370L
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
47L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AbarthPulse1.3 T2705,750 rpm1,850 rpm6,000 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAbarthPulse1.3 T270MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.4 s
61.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
175 hp
130 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 11 hp more than Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270.

The biggest power difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T2708.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.3 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has more power, Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
175 hp
130 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,575 mm
62.0 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAbarthPulse1.3 T270MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
175 hp
130 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
-
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,575 mm
62.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
-
895 km
556 mi
Trunk score
370 L
13.1 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 T270
1.5T
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsChevroletSeeker1.5T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.3 T270
Cooper S 2.0
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.3 T270
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.3 T270
40 TFSI
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.3 T270
GLA 200
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1.3 T270
1.6 PureTech
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1.3 T270
2.0 TSI
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster