Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAbarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    360 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
254hp189kW
237hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,625kg3,583lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
56.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
-
Length
5,042mm199in
4,187mm165in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,779mm70in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,559mm101in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,520mm60in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
-
Trunk volume
264L
360L
Max trunk volume-
1,231L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
35.2 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
237 hp
177 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 17 hp more than Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
1,625 kg
3,583 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T54.9 s
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh6.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh: 1.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
237 hp
177 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,187 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
Power
254 hp
189 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
6.2 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,187 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
7,000 km
4,350 mi
-
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.82 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used150 L40 US gal33 UK gal
Annual fuel cost262.50 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh

  • Is 845 kg lighter
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 96 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Turismo 54 kWh
1.3 T270
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
Turismo 54 kWh
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Turismo 54 kWh
28T
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsCadillacGT428T
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Turismo 54 kWh
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Turismo 54 kWh
2.0 TSI
VS
Abarth600eTurismo 54 kWhvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Abarth 600e Turismo 54 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster