Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

45 TFSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    235.2 mpg US
    282.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,000 km
    4,350 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
254hp189kW
245hp183kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
67.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
23.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
652km405mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,484mm177in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,856mm73in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,616mm64in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
-
Trunk volume
264L
530L
Max trunk volume-
1,525L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
23.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
1,620 kg
3,571 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T54.9 s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 8.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,000 km
4,350 mi
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
652 km
405 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW
5.8 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
4.9 s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
254 hp
189 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.8 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Range score
7,000 km
4,350 mi
652 km
405 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Consumption1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.75 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.82 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used150 L40 US gal33 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost262.50 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 8.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,348 km (3,944 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 850 kg lighter
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 266 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster