Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    235.2 mpg US
    282.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,000 km
    4,350 mi
  • Largest trunk
    264 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254hp189kW
254hp189kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
2,136kg4,709lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
2,781kg6,131lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
99.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
1,276km793mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,995mm197in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
170mm7in
Trunk volume
264L
258L
Max trunk volume-
1,971L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
6
Fuel tank
70L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
41.0 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T54.9 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 3.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 4.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,000 km
4,350 mi
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
4.9 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
8.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
7,000 km
4,350 mi
1,276 km
793 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.75 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.82 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used150 L40 US gal33 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost262.50 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 3.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5,724 km (3,557 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 334 kg lighter
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster