Car comparison

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    181 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    235.2 mpg US
    282.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,000 km
    4,350 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
265hp198kW
254hp189kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,465kg3,230lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
3,020kg6,658lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
68.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
22.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
633km393mi
Calculated
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,451mm175in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,679mm105in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,583mm62in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
190mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
264L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
50L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI5,600-6,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
22.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI6.5 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T54.9 s

Although Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI has more power, Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 6.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
633 km
393 mi
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,000 km
4,350 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
265 hp
198 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
4.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
633 km
393 mi
7,000 km
4,350 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km1.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi2.82 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal150 L40 US gal33 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year262.50 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 1,005 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 186 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,367 km (3,956 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI vs Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster