Lynk & Co 09
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 300 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score100/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest2,365 kg5,214 lb
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 2,365kg5,214lb |
| Gross weight | 3,020kg6,658lb | 2,995kg6,603lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 82.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 38.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 7,000km4,350mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 5,042mm199in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | 1,977mm78in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 190mm7in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 264L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 38.4 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 2.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 4.9 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.0 L/100 km 235.2 mpg US 282.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 7,000 km 4,350 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 264 L 9.3 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 1.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 2.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 150 L40 US gal33 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 262.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 2.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 256 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























