Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)

EQE 300 100 kWh

245 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
254hp189kW
245hp183kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
2,365kg5,214lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
2,995kg6,603lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
82.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
38.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
-
Length
5,042mm199in
4,863mm191in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,940mm76in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
3,030mm119in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,654mm65in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,659mm65in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
181mm7in
Trunk volume
264L
520L
Max trunk volume-
1,675L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
38.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
245 hp
183 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2,365 kg
5,214 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 2.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
245 hp
183 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
254 hp
189 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
2,365 kg
5,214 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
7,000 km
4,350 mi
-
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.82 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used150 L40 US gal33 UK gal
Annual fuel cost262.50 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 2.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 256 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster