Images may not match the exact vehicle variant.
381 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present
0-100 km/h 6.2 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Performance
| Power | 381hp284kW+127 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Curb weight | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Gross weight | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s-1.8 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s-23.2 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s-1.7 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s-1.5 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph-14.2 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 71L |
| Estimated range | 789km490mi Calculated |
Engine and drivetrain
Dimensions and space
| Length | 5,042mm199in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,977mm78in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 269L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 6 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 (Stage 3) | 381 hp 284 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 (Stage 3) | 6.2 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 (Stage 3) | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 (Stage 3) | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)PowerTorque
- Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 (Stage 3) | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsAUDIQ645 TFSI
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsChevroletBlazer650T
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T