AUDI Q6
Car comparison
AUDI Q6 45 TFSIvsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 09
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted207 km/h129 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk286 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Lightest2,120 kg4,674 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range789 km490 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 47.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 789km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 5,042mm199in |
| Width | 2,014mm79in | 1,977mm78in |
| Height | 1,784mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,721mm68in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 269L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,398L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 47.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 45 TFSI and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 756 km 470 mi |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 789 km 490 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 789 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 269 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q6 45 TFSI | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.21 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.08 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,389 L367 US gal306 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,431 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























