Chevrolet Blazer
Car comparison
Chevrolet Blazer 650TvsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 09
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Largest trunk269 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletBlazer650T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.9s Calculated | 47.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 789km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,999mm197in | 5,042mm199in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 1,977mm78in |
| Height | 1,732mm68in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,863mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,687mm66in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,683mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 222L | 269L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,970L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletBlazer650T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.9 s | 47.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 has 17 hp more than Chevrolet Blazer 650T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Blazer 650T and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 9.0 s |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletBlazer650T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 789 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 222 L 7.8 cu ft | 269 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























