Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

249 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Lynk & Co 09

2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,814 kg
    3,999 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    601 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    789 km
    490 mi
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
249hp186kW
254hp189kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,814kg3,999lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Gross weight-
2,735kg6,030lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
89.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
34.4s
Calculated
47.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
691km429mi
Calculated
789km490mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,648mm65in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,625mm64in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,624mm64in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
601L
269L
Max trunk volume
1,386L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
67L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co092.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.4 s
47.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 has 5 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,814 kg
3,999 lb
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
2,120 kg
4,674 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
229 km/h
142 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i7.5 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T58.0 s

Although Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 has more power, Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
691 km
429 mi
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
789 km
490 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW
7.5 s
229 km/h
142 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
8.0 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
7.5 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
249 hp
186 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.0 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,814 kg
3,999 lb
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
691 km
429 mi
789 km
490 mi
Trunk score
601 L
21.2 cu ft
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 306 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 332 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0i
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0i
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0TD T5
650T
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0TD T5
2.0 T5
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i vs Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster