Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Lynk & Co 09

2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Lightest
    2,120 kg
    4,674 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    269 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254hp189kW
254hp189kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
2,735kg6,030lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
47.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
789km490mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
258L
269L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
6
Fuel tank
74L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
Lynk & Co092.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
47.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
2,120 kg
4,674 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T58.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
789 km
490 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
8.0 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
789 km
490 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 487 km (303 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Is 16 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 11 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsAUDIQ645 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0TD T5
650T
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsChevroletBlazer650T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0TD T5
2.0 T5
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster