Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Lynk & Co 09

2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    877 km
    545 mi
  • Largest trunk
    314 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lightest
    2,120 kg
    4,674 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
250hp186kW
254hp189kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,151kg4,742lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Gross weight-
2,735kg6,030lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
47.5s
Calculated
47.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
877km545mi
Calculated
789km490mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
314L
269L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
71L
71L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
Lynk & Co092.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.5 s
47.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
2,120 kg
4,674 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T58.0 s

Although Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
789 km
490 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
8.0 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Lynk & Co092.0TD T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
877 km
545 mi
789 km
490 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
269 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 88 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 31 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0TD T5
650T
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co092.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 vs Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster