Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsLynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 09
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk431 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Best estimated range789 km490 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 93.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 789km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 5,042mm199in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,977mm78in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 269L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 6 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 789 km 490 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Lynk & Co092.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,120 kg 4,674 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 789 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 269 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T5
- Has 78 km (48 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























