Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed251 km/h156 mph
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest2,151 kg4,742 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions189 g/km
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk314 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW+125 hp | 325hp242kW+75 hp | 295hp220kW+45 hp | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,151kg4,742lb | 2,151kg4,742lb | 2,151kg4,742lb | 2,151kg4,742lb |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-11.6 s Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph-4.8 s Calculated | 92.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph-0.7 s Calculated | 93.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 6.7s-1.2 s | 7.1s-0.8 s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s-24.0 s Calculated | 28.2s-19.3 s Calculated | 32.3s-15.3 s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 314L | 314L | 314L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 189g/km | 189g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 28.2 s | 32.3 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp has 125 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 250 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 250 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 877 km 545 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 877 km 545 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 877 km 545 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW | 6.1 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 7.1 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5250 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 877 km 545 mi | 877 km 545 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























