Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017

300

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    877 km
    545 mi
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,787 kg
    3,940 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    133 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    501 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
250hp186kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,151kg4,742lb
1,787kg3,940lb
Gross weight-
2,309kg5,090lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
47.5s
Calculated
46.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
877km545mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,646mm65in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,659mm105in
Front track
1,673mm66in
-
Rear track
1,675mm66in
-
Ground clearance
238mm9in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
314L
501L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
60L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173004,800-5,600 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.5 s
46.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 12 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1,787 kg
3,940 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173007.4 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
638 km
397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
250 hp
186 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
1,787 kg
3,940 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
Range score
877 km
545 mi
638 km
397 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 238 km (148 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Is 364 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 187 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
300
200t
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
300
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
300
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
300
2.0 D5
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster