BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) 30dvsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range1,176 km731 mi
- Largest trunk326 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Lightest2,151 kg4,742 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)30d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,151kg4,742lb |
| Gross weight | 3,220kg7,099lb | - |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.5s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,176km731mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,705mm67in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) 30d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)30d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.5 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) 30d has 15 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and BMW X7 (G07) 30d: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 7.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 30d and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 30d and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 1,176 km 731 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)30d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,176 km 731 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) 30d | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) 30d
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 270 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 300 km (186 mi) more estimated range
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Is 219 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























