Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    185 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    877 km
    545 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
2,151kg4,742lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
47.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
877km545mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
71L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
47.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
877 km
545 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 356 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 186 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster