Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T4 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,927 kg4,248 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW+95 hp | 247hp184kW+57 hp | 224hp167kW+34 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm | 405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm | 366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph-7.9 s Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph-2.8 s Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph+0.7 s Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 6.7s-1.2 s | 7.1s-0.8 s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s-38.7 s Calculated | 30.4s-33.2 s Calculated | 35.0s-28.5 s Calculated | 63.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 169g/km | 169g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 30.4 s | 35.0 s | 63.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp has 95 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 190 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 190 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























