Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,460 kg
    3,219 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    850 km
    528 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Gross weight
2,055kg4,530lb
-
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
32.8s
Calculated
63.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
850km528mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
470L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions-
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T45,000 rpm1,620-4,020 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.8 s
63.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
227 km/h
141 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T47.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
850 km
528 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.7 s
227 km/h
141 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
850 km
528 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
-
169 g/km
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 467 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster