BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range850 km528 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | - |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 467 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























