Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P200

200 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,757 kg
    3,874 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    835 km
    519 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    169 g/km
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,757kg3,874lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
47.1s
Calculated
63.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
835km519mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,234L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
60L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2005,500 rpm1,250 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T45,000 rpm1,620-4,020 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.1 s
63.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2008.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T47.9 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
835 km
519 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
7.9 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
835 km
519 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
186 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 170 kg lighter
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 17 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P200
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 P200
2.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 T4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 P200
20d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 P200
40 TDI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 T4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 T4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 T4
20d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
2.0 T4
2.2 JTDM
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster