Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 63.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 63.6 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 507 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























