Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
-
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
82.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
63.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,546mm61in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,541mm61in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
161mm6in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
445L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,290L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L
CO2 emissions-
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T45,000 rpm1,620-4,020 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
63.6 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T47.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.9 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
-
169 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 507 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster