Car comparison

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tayron X

380TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2020-2022
VS

Volkswagen Teramont X

2.0T

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,755 kg
    3,869 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTayron X380TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220hp164kW
220hp164kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,755kg3,869lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
109.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
46.7s
Calculated
63.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,626mm182in
4,905mm193in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,719mm68in
Wheelbase
2,730mm107in
2,980mm117in
Trunk volume
525L
509L
Max trunk volume-
1,719L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSIVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTayron X380TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.7 s
63.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
220 hp
164 kW
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
220 hp
164 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
2,040 kg
4,497 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI7.6 s
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
220 hp
164 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,905 mm
193.1 in
Height
1,719 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTayron X380TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTayron X380TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220 hp
164 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,905 mm
193.1 in
Height
1,719 mm
67.7 in
Range score
-
814 km
506 mi
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tayron X 380TSIVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI

  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI vs Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster