Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200vsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range814 km506 mi
- Largest trunk509 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Gross weight | 2,340kg5,159lb | - |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.9s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,826mm190in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,873mm113in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,719L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 166g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | - | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 685 km 426 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 166 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 129 km (80 mi) more estimated range
- Has 84 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























