Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,319 kg2,908 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Largest trunk509 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,319kg2,908lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | - |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 108.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 63.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,406mm55in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 129mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | 1,719L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 63.1 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 1,319 kg 2,908 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 859 km 534 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,319 kg 2,908 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 GTS 2.0 TSI
- Is 721 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Has 197 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























