Volkswagen Teramont X
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0TvsVolkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023 380TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023
380TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range814 km506 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score84/100
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 380TSI
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 108.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 110.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 63.1s Calculated | 64.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.2mpg US32.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | 810km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,905mm193in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,719mm68in | 1,729mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,980mm117in |
| Trunk volume | 509L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,719L | 1,719L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 380TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 4,900-6,700 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 63.1 s | 64.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 380TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.2 mpg US 32.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 814 km 506 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 810 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.2 mpg US 32.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.2 mpg US 32.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.2 mpg US 32.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.2 mpg US 32.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | 810 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T | Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.2 mpg US32.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 15.12 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 24.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,296 L342 US gal285 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,268 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 380TSI
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























