Volkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023 530 V6vsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range814 km506 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.8s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km448mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,917mm194in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,729mm68in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,980mm117in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,719L | 1,719L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.8 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 has 79 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: 79 hp (59 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 722 km 448 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 448 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6
- Has 79 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























