Volkswagen Teramont X
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6vsVolkswagen Tayron X 380TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tayron X
380TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | VolkswagenTayron X380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 92.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.8s Calculated | 46.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,905mm193in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,719mm68in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,730mm107in |
| Trunk volume | 509L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,719L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | VolkswagenTayron X380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.8 s | 46.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 has 79 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 79 hp (59 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 and Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | VolkswagenTayron X380TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 | Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Has 79 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tayron X 380TSI
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























