Volkswagen Tayron X
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 107.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.0s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,626mm182in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,980mm117in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,719L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.0 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has 34 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























