Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 C 200vsVolkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tayron X
330TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | - |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 102.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 107.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.5s Calculated | 54.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,497cc91cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 88mm3in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 525L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | - | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.5 s | 54.0 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI has 2 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 8.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 | Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























