Volkswagen Scirocco III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,344 kg2,963 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range679 km422 mi
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,344kg2,963lb | 1,591kg3,508lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 598km371mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,248mm167in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,394mm55in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,553mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | 106mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 183L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | 358L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 1,344 kg 2,963 lb |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 6.0 s |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 679 km 422 mi |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,344 kg 2,963 lb | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 598 km 371 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 247 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Has 129 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























