Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsVolkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III
R 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,344 kg2,963 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed263 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,344kg2,963lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 679km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,347mm171in | 4,248mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,394mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,553mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 1,344 kg 2,963 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 679 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,344 kg 2,963 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 679 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 | Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























