Car comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III

R 2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2009-2014
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,344 kg
    2,963 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    197 hp/t
    147 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    679 km
    422 mi
  • Largest trunk
    312 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
265hp198kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,344kg2,963lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,770kg3,902lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
78.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
21.3s
Calculated
29.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
3,168cc193cu in
Length
4,248mm167in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,394mm55in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,553mm61in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,561mm61in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
132mm5in
-
Trunk volume
312L
205L
Max trunk volume
1,006L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI6,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.3 s
29.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
1,344 kg
2,963 lb
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI6.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
679 km
422 mi
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,248 mm
167.2 in
Height
1,394 mm
54.9 in
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,344 kg
2,963 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,248 mm
167.2 in
Height
1,394 mm
54.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
598 km
371 mi
Trunk score
312 L
11.0 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
RS Trophy 2.0 16V
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
R 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
R 2.0 TSI
2.9
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
R 2.0 TSI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
Volkswagen Scirocco III R 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster