Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,941 kg
    4,279 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
240hp179kW
235hp175kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,941kg4,279lb
2,051kg4,522lb
Gross weight
2,529kg5,575lb
-
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
36.9s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
1,183km735mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,699mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,789mm110in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
197mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
230L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
71L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.9 s
37.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 5 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2,051 kg
4,522 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
1,183 km
735 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
230 L
8.1 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 246 km (153 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 275 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 9 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 B5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
RS 2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 D5
25i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.0 D5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsBMWX2 (F39)25d
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster