Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017

300

238 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDILexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
240hp179kW
238hp177kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,941kg4,279lb
1,837kg4,050lb
Gross weight
2,529kg5,575lb
2,359kg5,201lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
74.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
36.9s
Calculated
45.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
612km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,699mm185in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,646mm65in
Wheelbase
2,789mm110in
2,659mm105in
Front track
1,579mm62in
-
Rear track
1,567mm62in
-
Ground clearance
197mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
230L
501L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDILexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173004,800-5,600 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDILexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.9 s
45.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 2 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1,837 kg
4,050 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173007.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
612 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDILexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
240 hp
179 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
1,837 kg
4,050 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
612 km
380 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
-
Trunk score
230 L
8.1 cu ft
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDILexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Is 104 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 271 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster