Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Lightest1,837 kg4,050 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk501 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,941kg4,279lb | 1,837kg4,050lb |
| Gross weight | 2,529kg5,575lb | 2,359kg5,201lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 45.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,699mm185in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,789mm110in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 197mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 230L | 501L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 45.6 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 2 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 7.0 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 938 km 583 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.0 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Is 104 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 271 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























