Car comparison

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC40

2.0 T5

247 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    247 hp
    184 kW
  • Lightest
    1,680 kg
    3,704 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    164 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC402.0 T5SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
247hp184kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,220kg4,894lb
2,529kg5,575lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
28.7s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,425mm174in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,863mm73in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,702mm106in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,626mm64in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance
211mm8in
197mm8in
Trunk volume
460L
230L
Max trunk volume
1,336L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
54L
60L
CO2 emissions
164g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC402.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC402.0 T5SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.7 s
36.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 7 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T56.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T5
750 km
466 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC402.0 T5SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
247 hp
184 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
164 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC40 2.0 T5Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 261 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 230 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 T5
45 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
45 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 T5
25i
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster