Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25ivsVolvo XC40 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25i

231 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 T5

247 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    897 km
    557 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Most powerful
    247 hp
    184 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
231hp172kW
247hp184kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
2,220kg4,894lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
69.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
28.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
897km557mi
Calculated
750km466mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,863mm73in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
460L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,336L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
54L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
164g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25iVolvo XC40 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25i: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC402.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
28.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 16 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25i and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
VolvoXC402.0 T5
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T5
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i6.6 s
VolvoXC402.0 T56.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and BMW X1 (F48) 25i: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
897 km
557 mi
VolvoXC402.0 T5
750 km
466 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 25i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.6 s
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25i
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
231 hp
172 kW
247 hp
184 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
897 km
557 mi
750 km
466 mi
CO2 score
155 g/km
164 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25iVolvo XC40 2.0 T5
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 9 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25i
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25i vs Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster