Car comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M)

45 TDI V6

231 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,941 kg
    4,279 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6

  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    696 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
2,145kg4,729lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,890kg6,371lb
2,529kg5,575lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
100.2s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,119km696mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,986mm196in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,995mm79in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,995mm118in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,679mm66in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,691mm67in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance-
197mm8in
Trunk volume
605L
230L
Max trunk volume
1,755L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
75L
60L
CO2 emissions
176g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V63,250-4,750 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm5,000 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
36.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
231 hp
172 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 9 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2,145 kg
4,729 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V67.1 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
1,119 km
696 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
231 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.1 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
2,145 kg
4,729 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,119 km
696 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
176 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6

  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 375 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 204 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 9 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TDI V6
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
45 TDI V6
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
45 TDI V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
45 TDI V6
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
45 TDI V6
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6vsAUDIQ240 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster