Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
245hp183kW
240hp179kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
2,529kg5,575lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
197mm8in
Trunk volume
500L
230L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
36.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 has 5 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 146 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 270 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0
2.0 T5
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster