Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDIvsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

45 TDI

231 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,048 km
    651 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,870kg4,123lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,565kg5,655lb
2,529kg5,575lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
76.2s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
30.4s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,048km651mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance-
197mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
230L
Max trunk volume-
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDISkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI3,250-4,750 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm5,000 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.4 s
36.9 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
231 hp
172 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 9 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
228 km/h
142 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI6.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
1,048 km
651 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
231 hp
172 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,048 km
651 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDISkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI

  • Is 71 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 320 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
45 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
45 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
45 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
45 TDI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
45 TDI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TDI vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster