Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score89/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,707kg3,763lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.8s Calculated | 68.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 193mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.8 s | 68.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 13 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























