Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 Skyactiv-X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,467 kg3,234 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 224Nm165lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,707kg3,763lb | 1,467kg3,234lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 68.9s Calculated | 63.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,109km689mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 193mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 105g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 68.9 s | 63.7 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 3 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,109 km 689 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 105 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 156 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























