Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Lightest1,707 kg3,763 lb
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t77 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,707kg3,763lb | 1,921kg4,235lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 68.9s Calculated | 70.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 193mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | - | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 68.9 s | 70.8 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 13 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,921 kg 4,235 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb | 1,921 kg 4,235 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Is 214 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























