Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,706 kg3,761 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score88/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,706kg3,761lb | 1,707kg3,763lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.0s Calculated | 68.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 193mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.0 s | 68.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 13 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.5 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 1 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























